FANDOM


800px-Ayn Rand Marker

Grave marker of Frank O'Connor and Ayn Rand. Photo by Mark Paulin. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons.

Ayn Rand
[[File:|frameless|alt=]]
Born Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum
February (1905-Template:MONTHNUMBER-02)2, 1905
Saint Petersburg, Russian Empire
Died March 6, 1982(1982-Template:MONTHNUMBER-06) (aged 77)
New York City, New York, U.S.
Resting place Kensico Cemetery, Valhalla, Westchester County, New York, U.S.
Occupation Writer, philosopher
Language English
Ethnicity Russian Jewish
Citizenship United States
Alma mater Petrograd State University
Period 1934–1982
Subjects Philosophy
Notable work(s) The Fountainhead
Atlas Shrugged
Notable award(s) Template:Awards
Spouse(s) Frank O'Connor
(m. 1929 – November 7, 1979, his death)

Template:Collapsible list

Template:Collapsible list

Signature File:Sign Ayn Rand.png

Ayn Rand (Template:IPAc-en;[1] born Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum; Template:OldStyleDate – March 6, 1982) was a Russian-American novelist, philosopher,[2] playwright, and screenwriter. She is known for her two best-selling novels, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, and for developing a philosophical system she called Objectivism. Born and educated in Russia, Rand moved to the United States in 1926. She worked as a screenwriter in Hollywood and had a play produced on Broadway in 1935–1936. After two early novels that were initially less successful, she achieved fame with her 1943 novel The Fountainhead.

In 1957, she published her best-known work, the novel Atlas Shrugged. Afterward she turned to nonfiction to promote her philosophy, publishing her own magazines and releasing several collections of essays until her death in 1982. Rand advocated reason as the only means of acquiring knowledge and rejected all forms of faith and religion. She supported rational and ethical egoism, and rejected ethical altruism. In politics, she condemned the initiation of force as immoral and opposed all forms of collectivism and statism, instead supporting laissez-faire capitalism, which she believed was the only social system that protected individual rights. She promoted romantic realism in art. She was sharply critical of the philosophers and philosophical traditions known to her, except Aristotle.

Rand's fiction was poorly received by many literary critics,[3] and academia generally ignored or rejected her philosophy. The Objectivist movement attempts to spread her ideas, both to the public and in academic settings.[4] She has been a significant influence among libertarians and American conservatives.[5]

LifeEdit

Early lifeEdit

Rand was born Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum (Template:Lang-ru) on February 2, 1905, to a bourgeois family living in Saint Petersburg. She was the eldest of the three daughters of Zinovy Zakharovich Rosenbaum and his wife, Anna Borisovna (née Kaplan), largely non-observant Jews. Zinovy Rosenbaum was a successful pharmacist, eventually owning a pharmacy and the building in which it was located.[6] She found school unchallenging, and claimed to have begun writing screenplays at the age of eight and novels at the age of ten.[7] Rand was twelve at the time of the February Revolution of 1917, during which she favored Alexander Kerensky over Tsar Nicholas II.

The subsequent October Revolution and the rule of the Bolsheviks under Vladimir Lenin disrupted the comfortable life the family had previously enjoyed. Her father’s pharmacy business was confiscated and the family displaced. They fled to the Crimea, which was initially under control of the White Army during the Russian Civil War. She later recalled that while in high school she determined that she was an atheist and that she valued reason above any other human virtue. After graduating from high school in the Crimea at 16, Rand returned with her family to Petrograd (the new name for Saint Petersburg), where they faced desperate conditions, on occasion nearly starving.[8][9]

File:Twelvecollegia.jpg

After the Russian Revolution, universities were opened to women, allowing Rand to be in the first group of women to enroll at Petrograd State University,[10] where she studied in the department of social pedagogy, majoring in history.[11] At the university she was introduced to the writings of Aristotle and Plato,[12] who would be her greatest influence and counter-influence, respectively.[13] A third figure whose philosophical works she studied heavily was Friedrich Nietzsche.[14] Able to read French, German and Russian, Rand also discovered the writers Fyodor Dostoevsky, Victor Hugo, Edmond Rostand, and Friedrich Schiller, who became her perennial favorites.[15]

Along with many other "bourgeois" students, Rand was purged from the university shortly before graduating. However, after complaints from a group of visiting foreign scientists, many of the purged students were allowed to complete their work and graduate,[16] which Rand did in October 1924.[17] She subsequently studied for a year at the State Technicum for Screen Arts in Leningrad. For one of her assignments, she wrote an essay about the Polish actress Pola Negri, which became her first published work.[18]

By this time she had decided her professional surname for writing would be Rand,[19] possibly as a Cyrillic contraction of her birth surname,[20] and she adopted the first name Ayn, either from a Finnish name or from the Hebrew word Template:Lang (ayin, meaning "eye").[21]

File:Pola Negri by Ayn Rand cover.jpg

Arrival in America Edit

In the fall of 1925, Rand was granted a visa to visit American relatives. Rand was so impressed with the skyline of Manhattan upon her arrival in New York Harbor that she cried what she later called "tears of splendor".[22] Intent on staying in the United States to become a screenwriter, she lived for a few months with relatives in Chicago, one of whom owned a movie theater and allowed her to watch dozens of films for free. She then set out for Hollywood, California.[23]

Initially, Rand struggled in Hollywood and took odd jobs to pay her basic living expenses. A chance meeting with famed director Cecil B. DeMille led to a job as an extra in his film, The King of Kings, and to subsequent work as a junior screenwriter.[24] While working on The King of Kings, she met an aspiring young actor, Frank O'Connor; the two were married on April 15, 1929. Rand became an American citizen in 1931. Taking various jobs during the 1930s to support her writing, Rand worked for a time as the head of the costume department at RKO Studios.[25] She made several attempts to bring her parents and sisters to the United States, but they were unable to acquire permission to emigrate.[26]

Early fictionEdit

Template:See also

Rand's first literary success came with the sale of her screenplay Red Pawn to Universal Studios in 1932, although it was never produced.[27] This was followed by the courtroom drama Night of January 16th, first produced by E.E. Clive in Hollywood in 1934 and then successfully reopened on Broadway in 1935. Each night the "jury" was selected from members of the audience, and one of the two different endings, depending on the jury's "verdict", would then be performed.[28] In 1941, Paramount Pictures produced a movie version of the play. Rand did not participate in the production and was highly critical of the result.[29]

Rand's first novel, the semi-autobiographical We the Living, was published in 1936. Set in Soviet Russia, it focused on the struggle between the individual and the state. In a 1959 foreword to the novel, Rand stated that We the Living "is as near to an autobiography as I will ever write. It is not an autobiography in the literal, but only in the intellectual sense. The plot is invented, the background is not..."[30] Initial sales were slow and the American publisher let it go out of print,[31] although European editions continued to sell.[32] After the success of her later novels, Rand was able to release a revised version in 1959 that has since sold over three million copies.[33] Without Rand's knowledge or permission, the novel was made into a pair of Italian films, Noi vivi and Addio, Kira, in 1942. Rediscovered in the 1960s, these films were re-edited into a new version which was approved by Rand and re-released as We the Living in 1986.[34]

Her novella Anthem was written during a break from the writing of her next major novel, The Fountainhead. It presents a vision of a dystopian future world in which totalitarian collectivism has triumphed to such an extent that even the word 'I' has been forgotten and replaced with 'we'.[35] It was published in England in 1938, but Rand initially could not find an American publisher. As with We the Living, Rand's later success allowed her to get a revised version published in 1946, which has sold more than 3.5 million copies.[36]

The Fountainhead and political activismEdit

Template:See also During the 1940s, Rand became politically active. Both she and her husband worked full-time in volunteer positions for the 1940 presidential campaign of Republican Wendell Willkie. This work led to Rand's first public speaking experiences, including fielding the sometimes hostile questions from New York City audiences who had just viewed pro-Willkie newsreels, an experience she greatly enjoyed.[37] This activity also brought her into contact with other intellectuals sympathetic to free-market capitalism. She became friends with journalist Henry Hazlitt and his wife, and Hazlitt introduced her to the Austrian School economist Ludwig von Mises. Despite her philosophical differences with them, Rand strongly endorsed the writings of both men throughout her career, and both of them expressed admiration for her. Once Mises referred to Rand as "the most courageous man in America", a compliment that particularly pleased her because he said "man" instead of "woman".[38] Rand also developed a friendship with libertarian writer Isabel Paterson. Rand questioned the well-informed Paterson about American history and politics long into the night during their numerous meetings and gave Paterson ideas for her only nonfiction book, The God of the Machine.[39]

Rand's first major success as a writer came with The Fountainhead in 1943, a romantic and philosophical novel that she wrote over a period of seven years.[40] The novel centers on an uncompromising young architect named Howard Roark and his struggle against what Rand described as "second-handers"—those who attempt to live through others, placing others above self. It was rejected by twelve publishers before finally being accepted by the Bobbs-Merrill Company on the insistence of editor Archibald Ogden, who threatened to quit if his employer did not publish it.[41] While completing the novel, Rand was prescribed the amphetamine Benzedrine to fight fatigue.[42] The drug helped her to work long hours to meet her deadline for delivering the finished novel, but when the book was done, she was so exhausted that her doctor ordered two weeks' rest.[43] Her continued use of the drug for approximately three decades may have contributed to what some of her later associates described as volatile mood swings.[44]

The Fountainhead eventually became a worldwide success, bringing Rand fame and financial security.[45] In 1943, Rand sold the rights for a film version to Warner Bros., and she returned to Hollywood to write the screenplay. Finishing her work on that screenplay, she was hired by producer Hal Wallis as a screenwriter and script-doctor. Her work for Wallis included the screenplays for the Oscar-nominated Love Letters and You Came Along.[46] This role gave Rand time to work on other projects, including a planned nonfiction treatment of her philosophy to be called The Moral Basis of Individualism. Although the planned book was never completed, a condensed version was published as an essay titled "The Only Path to Tomorrow", in the January 1944 edition of Reader's Digest magazine.[47]

Template:Wikisource While working in Hollywood, Rand extended her involvement with free-market and anti-communist activism. She became involved with the Motion Picture Alliance for the Preservation of American Ideals, a Hollywood anti-Communist group, and wrote articles on the group's behalf. She also joined the anti-Communist American Writers Association.[48] A visit by Isabel Paterson to meet with Rand's California associates led to a final falling out between the two when Paterson made comments that Rand saw as rude to valued political allies.[49] In 1947, during the Second Red Scare, Rand testified as a "friendly witness" before the United States House Un-American Activities Committee. Her testimony described the disparity between her personal experiences in the Soviet Union and the portrayal of it in the 1944 film Song of Russia.[50] Rand argued that the film grossly misrepresented conditions in the Soviet Union, portraying life there as being much better and happier than it actually was.[51] She wanted to also criticize the lauded 1946 film The Best Years of Our Lives for what she interpreted as its negative presentation of the business world, but she was not allowed to testify about it.[52] When asked after the hearings about her feelings on the effectiveness of the investigations, Rand described the process as "futile".[53]

After several delays, the film version of The Fountainhead was released in 1949. Although it used Rand's screenplay with minimal alterations, she "disliked the movie from beginning to end", complaining about its editing, acting, and other elements.[54]

Atlas Shrugged and ObjectivismEdit

Template:See also In the years following the publication of The Fountainhead, Rand had received numerous letters from readers, some of whom it had profoundly influenced. In 1951 Rand moved from Los Angeles to New York City, where she gathered a group of these admirers around her. This group (jokingly designated "The Collective") included future Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, a young psychology student named Nathan Blumenthal (later Nathaniel Branden) and his wife Barbara, and Barbara's cousin Leonard Peikoff. At first the group was an informal gathering of friends who met with Rand on weekends at her apartment to discuss philosophy. Later she began allowing them to read the drafts of her new novel, Atlas Shrugged, as the manuscript pages were written. In 1954 Rand's close relationship with the much younger Nathaniel Branden turned into a romantic affair, with the consent of their spouses.[55]

Atlas Shrugged, published in 1957, was Rand's magnum opus.[56] Rand described the theme of the novel as "the role of the mind in man's existence—and, as a corollary, the demonstration of a new moral philosophy: the morality of rational self-interest."[57] It advocates the core tenets of Rand's philosophy of Objectivism and expresses her concept of human achievement. The plot involves a dystopian United States in which the most creative industrialists, scientists and artists go on strike and retreat to a mountainous hideaway where they build an independent free economy. The novel's hero and leader of the strike, John Galt, describes the strike as "stopping the motor of the world" by withdrawing the minds of the individuals most contributing to the nation's wealth and achievement. With this fictional strike, Rand intended to illustrate that without the efforts of the rational and productive, the economy would collapse and society would fall apart. The novel includes elements of romance,[58][59][60] mystery, and science fiction,[61] and it contains Rand's most extensive statement of Objectivism in any of her works of fiction, a lengthy monologue delivered by Galt.

Despite many negative reviews, Atlas Shrugged became an international bestseller, and in an interview with Mike Wallace, Rand declared herself "the most creative thinker alive".[62] After completing the novel, Rand fell into a severe depression.[63] Atlas Shrugged was Rand's last completed work of fiction; a turning point in her life, it marked the end of Rand's career as a novelist and the beginning of her role as a popular philosopher.[64]

In 1958 Nathaniel Branden established Nathaniel Branden Lectures, later incorporated as the Nathaniel Branden Institute (NBI), to promote Rand's philosophy. Collective members gave lectures for NBI and wrote articles for Objectivist periodicals that she edited. Rand later published some of these articles in book form. Critics, including some former NBI students and Branden himself, have described the culture of NBI as one of intellectual conformity and excessive reverence for Rand, with some describing NBI or the Objectivist movement itself as a cult or religion.[65] Rand expressed opinions on a wide range of topics, from literature and music to sexuality and facial hair, and some of her followers mimicked her preferences, wearing clothes to match characters from her novels and buying furniture like hers.[66] Rand was unimpressed with many of the NBI students[67] and held them to strict standards, sometimes reacting coldly or angrily to those who disagreed with her.[68] However, some former NBI students believe the extent of these behaviors has been exaggerated, with the problem being concentrated among Rand's closest followers in New York.[69]

Later yearsEdit

Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, Rand developed and promoted her Objectivist philosophy through her nonfiction works and by giving talks to students at institutions such as Yale, Princeton, Columbia,[70] Harvard, and MIT.[71] She received an honorary doctorate from Lewis & Clark College in 1963.[72] She also began delivering annual lectures at the Ford Hall Forum, responding afterward to questions from the audience.[73] During these speeches and Q&A sessions, she often took controversial stances on political and social issues of the day. These included supporting abortion rights,[74] opposing the Vietnam War and the military draft (but condemning many draft dodgers as "bums"),[75] supporting Israel in the Arab-Israeli War of 1973 as "civilized men fighting savages",[76] saying European colonists had the right to take land from American Indians,[77] and calling homosexuality "immoral" and "disgusting", while also advocating the repeal of all laws against it.[78] She also endorsed several Republican candidates for President of the United States, most strongly Barry Goldwater in 1964, whose candidacy she promoted in several articles for The Objectivist Newsletter.[79]

File:Ayn Rand Marker.jpg

In 1964 Nathaniel Branden began an affair with the young actress Patrecia Scott, whom he later married. Nathaniel and Barbara Branden kept the affair hidden from Rand. When she learned of it in 1968, though her romantic relationship with Branden had already ended,[80] Rand terminated her relationship with both Brandens, which led to the closure of NBI.[81] Rand published an article in The Objectivist repudiating Nathaniel Branden for dishonesty and other "irrational behavior in his private life".[82] Branden later apologized in an interview to "every student of Objectivism" for "perpetuating the Ayn Rand mystique" and for "contributing to that dreadful atmosphere of intellectual repressiveness that pervades the Objectivist movement."[83] In subsequent years, Rand and several more of her closest associates parted company.[84]

Rand underwent surgery for lung cancer in 1974 after decades of heavy smoking.[85] In 1976 she retired from writing her newsletter and, despite her initial objections, reluctantly allowed Evva Pryor, a consultant from her attorney's office, to sign her up for Social Security and Medicare.[86] During the late 1970s her activities within the Objectivist movement declined, especially after the death of her husband on November 9, 1979.[87] One of her final projects was work on a never-completed television adaptation of Atlas Shrugged.[88]

Rand died of heart failure on March 6, 1982, at her home in New York City,[89] and was interred in the Kensico Cemetery, Valhalla, New York.[90] Rand's funeral was attended by some of her prominent followers, including Alan Greenspan. A six-foot floral arrangement in the shape of a dollar sign was placed near her casket.[91] In her will, Rand named Leonard Peikoff the heir to her estate.[92]

PhilosophyEdit

Template:Objectivist movement

Main article: Objectivism (Ayn Rand)

Rand called her philosophy "Objectivism", describing its essence as "the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute."[93] She considered Objectivism a systematic philosophy and laid out positions on metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy and esthetics.[94]

In metaphysics, Rand supported philosophical realism, and opposed anything she regarded as mysticism or supernaturalism, including all forms of religion.[95] In epistemology, she considered all knowledge to be based on sense perception, the validity of which she considered axiomatic,[96] and reason, which she described as "the faculty that identifies and integrates the material provided by man's senses".[97] She rejected all claims of non-perceptual or a priori knowledge, including "'instinct,' 'intuition,' 'revelation,' or any form of 'just knowing.'"[98] In her Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, Rand presented a theory of concept formation and endorsed the rejection of the analytic–synthetic dichotomy.[99]

In ethics, Rand argued for rational egoism (rational self-interest), as the guiding moral principle. She said the individual should "exist for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself".[100] She referred to egoism as "the virtue of selfishness" in her book of that title,[101] in which she presented her solution to the is-ought problem by describing a meta-ethical theory that based morality in the needs of "man's survival qua man".[102] She condemned ethical altruism as incompatible with the requirements of human life and happiness,[103] and held that the initiation of force was evil and irrational, writing in Atlas Shrugged that "Force and mind are opposites".[104]

Rand's political philosophy emphasized individual rights (including property rights),[105] and she considered laissez-faire capitalism the only moral social system because in her view it was the only system based on the protection of those rights.[106] She opposed statism, which she understood to include theocracy, absolute monarchy, Nazism, fascism, communism, democratic socialism, and dictatorship.[107] Rand believed that rights should be enforced by a constitutionally limited government.[108] Although her political views are often classified as conservative or libertarian, she preferred the term "radical for capitalism". She worked with conservatives on political projects, but disagreed with them over issues such as religion and ethics.[109] She denounced libertarianism, which she associated with anarchism.[110] She rejected anarchism as a naïve theory based in subjectivism that could only lead to collectivism in practice.[111]

Rand's esthetics defined art as a "selective re-creation of reality according to an artist's metaphysical value-judgments". According to Rand, art allows philosophical concepts to be presented in a concrete form that can be easily grasped, thereby fulfilling a need of human consciousness.[112] As a writer, the art form Rand focused on most closely was literature, where she considered Romanticism to be the approach that most accurately reflected the existence of human free will.[113] She described her own approach to literature as "romantic realism".[114]

Rand acknowledged Aristotle as her greatest influence[115] and remarked that in the history of philosophy she could only recommend "three A's"—Aristotle, Aquinas, and Ayn Rand.[116] She also found early inspiration in Friedrich Nietzsche,[117] and scholars have found indications of his influence in early notes from Rand's journals,[118] in passages from the first edition of We the Living (which Rand later revised),[119] and in her overall writing style.[120] However, by the time she wrote The Fountainhead, Rand had turned against Nietzsche's ideas,[121] and the extent of his influence on her even during her early years is disputed.[122] Among the philosophers Rand held in particular disdain was Immanuel Kant, whom she referred to as a "monster",[123] although philosophers George Walsh[124] and Fred Seddon[125] have argued that she misinterpreted Kant and exaggerated their differences.

Rand said her most important contributions to philosophy were her "theory of concepts, [her] ethics, and [her] discovery in politics that evil—the violation of rights—consists of the initiation of force".[126] She believed epistemology was a foundational branch of philosophy and considered the advocacy of reason to be the single most significant aspect of her philosophy,[127] stating, "I am not primarily an advocate of capitalism, but of egoism; and I am not primarily an advocate of egoism, but of reason. If one recognizes the supremacy of reason and applies it consistently, all the rest follows."[128]

Reception and legacyEdit

ReviewsEdit

During Rand's lifetime, her work evoked both extreme praise and condemnation. Rand's first novel, We the Living, was admired by the literary critic H.L. Mencken,[129] her Broadway play Night of January 16th was both a critical and popular success,[130] and The Fountainhead was hailed by a reviewer in The New York Times as "masterful".[131] Rand's novels were derided by some critics when they were first published as being long and melodramatic.[3] However, they became bestsellers largely through word of mouth.[132]

The first reviews Rand received were for Night of January 16th. Reviews of the production were largely positive, but Rand considered even positive reviews to be embarrassing because of significant changes made to her script by the producer.[130] Rand believed that her first novel, We the Living, was not widely reviewed, but Rand scholar Michael S. Berliner says "it was the most reviewed of any of her works", with approximately 125 different reviews being published in more than 200 publications. Overall these reviews were more positive than the reviews she received for her later work.[133] Her 1938 novella Anthem received little attention from reviewers, both for its first publication in England and for subsequent re-issues.[134]

Rand's first bestseller, The Fountainhead, received far fewer reviews than We the Living, and reviewers' opinions were mixed.[135] There was a positive review in The New York Times that Rand greatly appreciated.[136] The reviewer called Rand "a writer of great power" who wrote "brilliantly, beautifully and bitterly", and stated that "you will not be able to read this masterful book without thinking through some of the basic concepts of our time".[131] There were other positive reviews, but Rand dismissed most of them as either not understanding her message or as being from unimportant publications.[135] Some negative reviews focused on the length of the novel,[3] such as one that called it "a whale of a book" and another that said "anyone who is taken in by it deserves a stern lecture on paper-rationing". Other negative reviews called the characters unsympathetic and Rand's style "offensively pedestrian".[135]

Rand's 1957 novel Atlas Shrugged was widely reviewed, and many of the reviews were strongly negative.[3][137] In the National Review, conservative author Whittaker Chambers called the book "sophomoric" and "remarkably silly". He described the tone of the book as "shrillness without reprieve" and accused Rand of supporting a Godless system (which he related to that of the Soviets), claiming "From almost any page of Atlas Shrugged, a voice can be heard, from painful necessity, commanding: 'To a gas chamber—go!Template:' "[138] Atlas Shrugged received positive reviews from a few publications, including praise from the noted book reviewer John Chamberlain,[137] but Rand scholar Mimi Reisel Gladstein later wrote that "reviewers seemed to vie with each other in a contest to devise the cleverest put-downs", calling it "execrable claptrap" and "a nightmare"; they said it was "written out of hate" and showed "remorseless hectoring and prolixity".[3] Author Flannery O'Connor wrote in a letter to a friend that "The fiction of Ayn Rand is as low as you can get re fiction. I hope you picked it up off the floor of the subway and threw it in the nearest garbage pail."[139]

Rand's nonfiction received far fewer reviews than her novels had. The tenor of the criticism for her first nonfiction book, For the New Intellectual, was similar to that for Atlas Shrugged,[140][141] with philosopher Sidney Hook likening her certainty to "the way philosophy is written in the Soviet Union",[142] and author Gore Vidal calling her viewpoint "nearly perfect in its immorality".[143] Her subsequent books got progressively less attention from reviewers.[140]

On the 100th anniversary of Rand's birth in 2005, Edward Rothstein, writing for The New York Times, referred to her fictional writing as quaint utopian "retro fantasy" and programmatic neo-Romanticism of the misunderstood artist, while criticizing her characters' "isolated rejection of democratic society".[144] In 2007, book critic Leslie Clark described her fiction as "romance novels with a patina of pseudo-philosophy".[145] In 2009, GQTemplate:'s critic columnist Tom Carson described her books as "capitalism's version of middlebrow religious novels" such as Ben-Hur and the Left Behind series.[146]

Popular interestEdit

File:Ayn Rand quote, American Adventure, Epcot Center, Walt Disney World.jpg.jpg

In 1991, a survey conducted for the Library of Congress and the Book-of-the-Month Club asked club members what the most influential book in the respondent's life was. Rand's Atlas Shrugged was the second most popular choice, after the Bible.[147] Rand's books continue to be widely sold and read, with 25 million copies sold as of 2007[148] and another 500,000 sold and 300,000 donated by the Ayn Rand Institute in 2008.[149] Although Rand's influence has been greatest in the United States, there has been international interest in her work.[150] Rand's work continues to be among the top sellers among books in India.[151]

Rand's contemporary admirers included fellow novelists, such as Ira Levin, Kay Nolte Smith and L. Neil Smith, and later writers such as Erika Holzer and Terry Goodkind have been influenced by her.[152] Other artists who have cited Rand as an important influence on their lives and thought include comic book artist Steve Ditko[153] and musician Neil Peart of Rush.[154] Rand provided a positive view of business, and in response business executives and entrepreneurs have admired and promoted her work.[155] John Allison of BB&T and Ed Snider of Comcast Spectacor have funded the promotion of Rand's ideas,[156] while Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks, and John P. Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods, among others, have said they consider Rand crucial to their success.[157]

Rand and her works have been referred to in a variety of media: on television shows including animated sitcoms, live-action comedies, dramas, and game shows,[158] as well as in movies and video games.[159] She, or characters based on her, figure prominently (in positive and negative lights) in literary and science fiction novels by prominent American authors.[160] Nick Gillespie, editor in chief of Reason, has remarked that "Rand's is a tortured immortality, one in which she's as likely to be a punch line as a protagonist..." and that "jibes at Rand as cold and inhuman, run through the popular culture".[161] Two movies have been made about Rand's life. A 1997 documentary film, Ayn Rand: A Sense of Life, was nominated for the Academy Award for Documentary Feature.[162] The Passion of Ayn Rand, a 1999 television adaptation of the book of the same name, won several awards.[148] Rand's image also appears on a U.S. postage stamp designed by artist Nick Gaetano.[163]

Political influenceEdit

File:TDTP08.JPG

Template:See also Although she rejected the labels "conservative" and "libertarian",[164] Rand has had continuing influence on right-wing politics and libertarianism.[5] Jim Powell, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, considers Rand one of the three most important women (along with Rose Wilder Lane and Isabel Paterson) of modern American libertarianism,[165] and David Nolan, one of the founders of the Libertarian Party, stated that "without Ayn Rand, the libertarian movement would not exist".[166] In his history of the libertarian movement, journalist Brian Doherty described her as "the most influential libertarian of the twentieth century to the public at large",[147] and biographer Jennifer Burns referred to her as "the ultimate gateway drug to life on the right".[167]

She faced intense opposition from William F. Buckley, Jr. and other contributors for the National Review magazine. They published numerous attacks in the 1950s and 1960s by Whittaker Chambers, Garry Wills, and M. Stanton Evans. Nevertheless, her influence among conservatives forced Buckley and other National Review contributors to reconsider how traditional notions of virtue and Christianity could be integrated with support for capitalism.[168]

The political figures who cite Rand as an influence are usually conservatives (often members of the United States Republican Party),[169] despite Rand taking some positions that are atypical for conservatives, such as being pro-choice and an atheist.[170] A 1987 article in The New York Times referred to her as the Reagan administration's "novelist laureate".[171] Republican Congressmen and conservative pundits have acknowledged her influence on their lives and recommended her novels.[172]

The late-2000s financial crisis spurred renewed interest in her works, especially Atlas Shrugged, which some saw as foreshadowing the crisis,[173] and opinion articles compared real-world events with the plot of the novel.[174] During this time, signs mentioning Rand and her fictional hero John Galt appeared at Tea Party protests.[175] There was also increased criticism of her ideas, especially from the political left, with critics blaming the economic crisis on her support of selfishness and free markets, particularly through her influence on Alan Greenspan.[176] For example, Mother Jones remarked that "Rand's particular genius has always been her ability to turn upside down traditional hierarchies and recast the wealthy, the talented, and the powerful as the oppressed",[170] while The Nation alleged similarities between the "moral syntax of Randianism" and fascism.[177]

Academic reactionEdit

During Rand's lifetime her work received little attention from academic scholars.[4] When the first academic book about Rand's philosophy appeared in 1971, its author declared writing about Rand "a treacherous undertaking" that could lead to "guilt by association" for taking her seriously.[178] A few articles about Rand's ideas appeared in academic journals before her death in 1982, many of them in The Personalist.[179] One of these was "On the Randian Argument" by libertarian philosopher Robert Nozick, who argued that her meta-ethical argument is unsound and fails to solve the is–ought problem posed by David Hume.[180] Some responses to Nozick by other academic philosophers were also published in The Personalist arguing that Nozick misstated Rand's case.[179] Academic consideration of Rand as a literary figure during her life was even more limited. Gladstein was unable to find any scholarly articles about Rand's novels when she began researching her in 1973, and only three such articles appeared during the rest of the 1970s.[181]

Since Rand's death, interest in her work has gradually increased.[182] Historian Jennifer Burns has identified "three overlapping waves" of scholarly interest in Rand, the most recent of which is "an explosion of scholarship" since the year 2000.[183] However, few universities currently include Rand or Objectivism as a philosophical specialty or research area, with many literature and philosophy departments dismissing her as a pop culture phenomenon rather than a subject for serious study.[184]

Academics Mimi Gladstein, Chris Sciabarra, Allan Gotthelf, Edwin A. Locke and Tara Smith have taught her work in academic institutions. Sciabarra co-edits the Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, a nonpartisan peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the study of Rand's philosophical and literary work.[185] In 1987 Gotthelf helped found the Ayn Rand Society with George Walsh and David Kelley, and has been active in sponsoring seminars about Rand and her ideas.[186] Smith has written several academic books and papers on Rand's ideas, including Ayn Rand's Normative Ethics: The Virtuous Egoist, a volume on Rand's ethical theory published by Cambridge University Press. Rand's ideas have also been made subjects of study at Clemson and Duke universities.[187] Scholars of English and American literature have largely ignored her work,[188] although attention to her literary work has increased since the 1990s.[189]

Some academic philosophers have criticized Rand for what they consider her lack of rigor and limited understanding of philosophical subject matter.[4][101] Chris Matthew Sciabarra has called into question the motives of some of Rand's critics because of the unusual hostility of their criticisms.[190] Sciabarra writes, "The left was infuriated by her anti-communist, pro-capitalist politics, whereas the right was disgusted with her atheism and civil libertarianism."[4]

Rand scholars Douglas Den Uyl and Douglas B. Rasmussen, while stressing the importance and originality of her thought, describe her style as "literary, hyperbolic and emotional".[191] Philosopher Jack Wheeler says that despite "the incessant bombast and continuous venting of Randian rage", Rand's ethics are "a most immense achievement, the study of which is vastly more fruitful than any other in contemporary thought."[192] In the Literary Encyclopedia entry for Rand written in 2001, John Lewis declared that "Rand wrote the most intellectually challenging fiction of her generation".[193] In a 1999 interview in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Rand scholar Chris Matthew Sciabarra commented, "I know they laugh at Rand", while forecasting a growth of interest in her work in the academic community.[194]

Philosopher Michael Huemer has argued that very few people find Rand's ideas convincing, especially her ethics,[195] which he believes is difficult to interpret and may lack logical coherence.[196] He attributes the attention she receives to her being a "compelling writer", especially as a novelist. Thus, Atlas Shrugged outsells not only the works of other philosophers of classical liberalism as Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich Hayek, or Frederic Bastiat, but also Rand's own non-fiction works.[195]

Philosopher Robert H. Bass has argued that her central ethical ideas are inconsistent and contradictory to her central political ideas.[197]

Objectivist movementEdit

Main article: Objectivist movement

In 1985, Rand's heir Leonard Peikoff established the Ayn Rand Institute, a nonprofit organization dedicated to spreading Rand's ideas and promoting her works. In 1990, philosopher David Kelley founded the Institute for Objectivist Studies, now known as The Atlas Society.[198] In 2001 historian John McCaskey organized the Anthem Foundation for Objectivist Scholarship, which provides grants for scholarly work on Objectivism in academia.[199] The charitable foundation of BB&T Corporation has also given grants for teaching Rand's ideas or works. The University of Texas at Austin, the University of Pittsburgh, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill are among the schools that have received grants. In some cases these grants have been controversial due to their requiring research or teaching related to Rand.[200]

Selected worksEdit

Template:Wikisource author

Main article: Bibliography for Ayn Rand and Objectivism

Template:Columns

ReferencesEdit

  1. Branden 1986, p. 71; Gladstein 1999, p. 9
  2. Den Uyl & Rasmussen 1986, p. x; Sciabarra 1995, pp. 1–2; Kukathas 1998, p. 55; Badhwar & Long 2010.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Gladstein 1999, pp. 117–119
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Sciabarra 1995, pp. 1–2
  5. 5.0 5.1 Burns 2009, p. 4; Gladstein 2009, pp. 107–108, 124
  6. Heller 2009, pp. 3–5; Britting 2004, pp. 2–3; Burns 2009, p. 9
  7. Template:Cite episode
  8. Branden 1986, pp. 35–39
  9. Britting 2004, pp. 14–20
  10. Burns 2009, p. 15
  11. Sciabarra 1995, p. 77
  12. Sciabarra 1999, pp. 5–8
  13. Heller 2009, p. 41; Peikoff 1991, pp. 451–460
  14. Britting 2004, pp. 17–18, 22–24
  15. Britting 2004, pp. 17, 22
  16. Heller 2009, p. 47; Britting 2004, p. 24
  17. Sciabarra 1999, p. 1
  18. 18.0 18.1 Heller 2009, pp. 49–50
  19. Britting 2004, p. 33
  20. Gladstein 2009, p. 7; Heller 2009, p. 55
  21. Rand said the origin of Ayn was Finnish Template:Harv, but some biographical sources question this, suggesting it may come from a Hebrew nickname. Heller 2009, pp. 55–57 provides a detailed discussion.
  22. Heller 2009, p. 53
  23. Heller 2009, pp. 57–60
  24. Britting 2004, pp. 34–36
  25. Britting 2004, pp. 35–40; Paxton 1998, pp. 74, 81, 84
  26. Heller 2009, pp. 96–98; Britting 2004, pp. 43–44, 52
  27. Britting 2004, pp. 40, 42
  28. Heller 2009, pp. 76, 92
  29. Heller 2009, pp. 78; Gladstein 2009, p. 87
  30. Rand, Ayn (1995) [1936]. "Foreword". We the Living (60th Anniversary ed.). New York: Dutton. p. xviii. ISBN 0-525-94054-5. OCLC 32780458.
  31. Gladstein 2009, p. 13
  32. Ralston, Richard E. "Publishing We the Living". In Mayhew 2004, p. 141
  33. Ralston, Richard E. "Publishing We the Living". In Mayhew 2004, p. 143
  34. Paxton 1998, p. 104
  35. Burns 2009, p. 50; Heller 2009, p. 102
  36. Ralston, Richard E. "Publishing Anthem". In Mayhew 2005a, pp. 24–27
  37. Britting 2004, p. 57
  38. Burns 2009, p. 114; Heller 2009, p. 249; Branden 1986, pp. 188–189
  39. Burns 2009, pp. 75–78
  40. Britting 2004, pp. 61–78
  41. Britting 2004, pp. 58–61
  42. Burns 2009, p. 85
  43. Burns 2009, p. 89
  44. Burns 2009, p. 178; Heller 2009, pp. 304–305
  45. Doherty 2007, p. 149; Branden 1986, pp. 180–181
  46. Britting 2004, pp. 68–80; Branden 1986, pp. 183–198
  47. Sciabarra 1995, p. 112; Heller 2009, p. 171
  48. Burns 2009, pp. 100–101, 123
  49. Burns 2009, pp. 130–131; Heller 2009, pp. 214–215
  50. Mayhew 2005b, pp. 91–93
  51. Mayhew 2005b, pp. 188–189
  52. Burns 2009, p. 125
  53. Mayhew 2005b, p. 83
  54. Britting 2004, p. 71
  55. Branden 1986, pp. 256–264, 331–343
  56. Sciabarra 1995, p. 113; Mayhew 2005b, p. 78
  57. Salmieri, Gregory. "Atlas Shrugged on the Role of the Mind in Man's Existence". In Mayhew 2009, p. 248
  58. Dowd, Maureen (April 17, 2011). "Atlas Without Angelina". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/opinion/17dowd.html. Retrieved July 30, 2012.
  59. McConnell 2010, pp. Al Ruddy section
  60. Interview Transcript (1999). "The Making Of The Atlas Shrugged TV MiniSeries Albert Ruddy, Susan Black, Bill Collins". Prodos Institute Inc.. http://www.prodos.com/transcript/atlasmovie.html. Retrieved August 3, 2012.
  61. Gladstein 1999, p. 42
  62. Burns 2009, p. 2
  63. Burns 2009, p. 178; Heller 2009, pp. 303–306
  64. Younkins 2007, p. 1
  65. Gladstein 2009, pp. 105–106; Burns 2009, pp. 232–233
  66. Burns 2009, pp. 236–237
  67. Heller 2009, p. 303
  68. Doherty 2007, pp. 237–238; Heller 2009, p. 329; Burns 2009, p. 235
  69. Doherty 2007, p. 235; Burns 2009, p. 235
  70. Branden 1986, pp. 315–316
  71. Gladstein 1999, p. 14
  72. Branden 1986, p. 318
  73. Gladstein 1999, p. 16
  74. Heller 2009, pp. 320–321
  75. Burns 2009, pp. 228–229, 265; Heller 2009, p. 352
  76. Rand 2005, p. 96; Burns 2009, p. 266
  77. Burns 2009, p. 266; Heller 2009, p. 391
  78. Heller 2009, pp. 362, 519
  79. Burns 2009, pp. 204–206; Heller 2009, pp. 322–323
  80. Britting 2004, p. 101
  81. Branden 1986, pp. 344–358
  82. Heller 2009, pp. 378–379
  83. Heller 2009, p. 411
  84. Branden 1986, pp. 386–389
  85. Heller 2009, pp. 391–393
  86. McConnell 2010, pp. 520–521
  87. Branden 1986, pp. 392–395
  88. Heller 2009, p. 406
  89. Heller 2009, p. 410
  90. Heller 2009, pp. 405, 410
  91. Branden 1986, p. 403
  92. Heller 2009, p. 400
  93. Rand 1992, pp. 1170–1171
  94. Peikoff 1991, pp. 2–3; Den Uyl & Rasmussen 1986, p. 224; Gladstein & Sciabarra 1999, p. 2
  95. Den Uyl, Douglas J. & Rasmussen, Douglas B. "Ayn Rand's Realism". In Den Uyl & Rasmussen 1986, pp. 3–20
  96. Peikoff 1991, pp. 38–39; Gotthelf 2000, p. 54
  97. Rand 1964, p. 22
  98. Rand 1982, pp. 62–63
  99. Salmieri & Gotthelf 2005, p. 1997; Gladstein 1999, pp. 85–86
  100. Rand 1989, p. 3
  101. 101.0 101.1 Kukathas 1998, p. 55
  102. Rand 1964, p. 25; Badhwar & Long 2010; Peikoff 1991, pp. 207, 219
  103. Badhwar & Long 2010
  104. Rand 1992, p. 1023; Peikoff 1991, pp. 313–320
  105. Peikoff 1991, pp. 350–352
  106. Gotthelf 2000, pp. 91–92; Peikoff 1991, pp. 379–380
  107. Peikoff 1991, pp. 369
  108. Peikoff 1991, p. 367
  109. Burns 2009, pp. 174–177, 209, 230–231; Den Uyl & Rasmussen 1986, pp. 225–226; Doherty 2007, pp. 189–190; Branden 1986, p. 252
  110. Sciabarra 1995, pp. 266–267; Burns 2009, pp. 268–269
  111. Sciabarra 1995, pp. 280–281; Peikoff 1991, pp. 371–372; Merrill 1991, p. 139
  112. Sciabarra 1995, pp. 204–205
  113. Peikoff 1991, p. 428
  114. Sciabarra 1995, p. 207; Peikoff 1991, p. 437
  115. Rand 1992, p. 1171
  116. Sciabarra 1995, p. 12
  117. Heller 2009, p. 42; Burns 2009, pp. 16, 22; Sciabarra 1995, pp. 100–106
  118. Rand 1997, pp. 21; Burns 2009, pp. 24–25; Sciabarra 1998, pp. 136, 138–139
  119. Merrill 1991, pp. 38–39; Sciabarra 1998, p. 135; Loiret-Prunet, Valerie. "Ayn Rand and Feminist Synthesis: Rereading We the Living". In Gladstein & Sciabarra 1999, p. 97
  120. Badhwar & Long 2010; Sheaffer, Robert. "Rereading Rand on Gender in the Light of Paglia". In Gladstein & Sciabarra 1999, p. 313.
  121. Burns 2009, pp. 41, 68; Heller 2009, p. 42; Merrill 1991, pp. 47–49
  122. Burns 2009, pp. 303–304; Sciabarra 1998, pp. 135, 137–138; Mayhew, Robert. "We the Living '36 and '59". In Mayhew 2004, p. 205.
  123. Rand 1971, p. 4
  124. Walsh 2000
  125. Seddon 2003, pp. 63–81
  126. Rand 2005, p. 166
  127. Rand, Ayn (1999). "The Left: Old and New". Return of the Primitive: The Anti-Industrial Revolution. Edited by Peter Schwartz. New York: Meridian. p. 62. ISBN 0-452-01184-1. OCLC 39281836.
  128. Rand 1971, p. 1
  129. Rand 1995, pp. 10, 13–14
  130. 130.0 130.1 Branden 1986, pp. 122–124
  131. 131.0 131.1 Pruette, Lorine (May 16, 1943). "Battle Against Evil". The New York Times: p. BR7. Archived from the original on May 11, 2011. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20610FD3D5C167B93C4A8178ED85F478485F9. Retrieved April 15, 2011. Reprinted in McGrath, Charles, ed. (1998). Books of the Century. New York: Times Books. pp. 135–136. ISBN 0-8129-2965-9. OCLC 38439024.
  132. Paxton 1998, p. 120; Britting 2004, p. 87
  133. Berliner, Michael S. "Reviews of We the Living". In Mayhew 2004, pp. 147–151
  134. Berliner, Michael S. "Reviews of Anthem". In Mayhew 2005a, pp. 55–60
  135. 135.0 135.1 135.2 Berliner, Michael S. "The Fountainhead Reviews". In Mayhew 2006, pp. 77–82
  136. Rand 1995, p. 74
  137. 137.0 137.1 Berliner, Michael S. "The Atlas Shrugged Reviews". In Mayhew 2009, pp. 133–137
  138. Chambers, Whittaker (December 8, 1957). "Big Sister is Watching You". National Review: 594–596. Archived from the original on May 11, 2011. http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/222482/big-sister-watching-you/flashback. Retrieved April 15, 2011.
  139. O'Connor, Flannery (1979). Fitzgerald, Sally. ed. The Habit of Being: Letters of Flannery O'Connor. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. p. 398. ISBN 0-374-52104-2. OCLC 18175642.
  140. 140.0 140.1 Gladstein 1999, p. 119
  141. Burns 2009, pp. 193–194
  142. Hook, Sidney (April 9, 1961). "Each Man for Himself". The New York Times Book Review: p. 28. Archived from the original on May 11, 2011. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70914F83B5B147A93CBA9178FD85F458685F9. Retrieved April 15, 2011.
  143. Vidal, Gore (1962). "Two Immoralists: Orville Prescott and Ayn Rand". Rocking the Boat. Boston: Little, Brown. p. 234. OCLC 291123. Reprinted from Esquire, July 1961.
  144. Rothstein, Edward (February 2, 2005). "Considering the Last Romantic, Ayn Rand, at 100". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 12, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/02/books/02rand.html?pagewanted=all. Retrieved April 15, 2011.
  145. Clark, Leslie (February 17, 2007). "The philosophical art of looking out number one". The Herald. http://www.heraldscotland.com/the-philosophical-art-of-looking-out-number-one-1.835066. Retrieved April 2, 2010.
  146. Corsello, Andrew (October 27, 2009). "The Bitch is Back". GQ (Condé Nast Publications). Archived from the original on May 14, 2011. http://www.gq.com/entertainment/books/200911/ayn-rand-dick-books-fountainhead?printable=true. Retrieved April 9, 2011.
  147. 147.0 147.1 Doherty 2007, p. 11
  148. 148.0 148.1 Gladstein 2009, p. 122
  149. Burns 2009, pp. 2, 299n.3
  150. Gladstein 2003, pp. 384–386; Delbroy, Bibek (2006). "Ayn Rand—The Indian Connection". In Machan, Tibor R. Ayn Rand at 100. New Delhi, India: Pragun Publications. pp. 2–4. ISBN 81-89645-57-9. OCLC 76829742.; Cohen, David (December 7, 2001). "A growing concern". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2001/dec/07/internationaleducationnews.highereducation. Retrieved April 15, 2011.
  151. Agence France-Presse/Jiji Press, "In India, Ayn Rand never out of style", Japan Times, 2 June 2012, p.4
  152. Riggenbach, Jeff (Fall 2004). "Ayn Rand's Influence on American Popular Fiction". The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 6 (1): 91–144. Archived from the original on May 14, 2011. http://www.aynrandstudies.com/jars/archives/jars6-1/jars6_1jriggenbach.pdf. Retrieved April 20, 2011.
  153. Sciabarra 2004, pp. 8–11
  154. Sciabarra, Chris Matthew (Fall 2002). "Rand, Rush, and Rock". The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1): 161–185. http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sciabarra/essays/rush.htm. Retrieved April 20, 2011.
  155. Burns 2009, pp. 168–171
  156. Burns 2009, p. 298; Branden 1986, p. 419
  157. Rubin, Harriet (September 15, 2007). "Ayn Rand's Literature of Capitalism". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 12, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/15/business/15atlas.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print. Retrieved April 15, 2011.
  158. Sciabarra 2004, pp. 4–5
  159. Burns 2009, p. 282
  160. Sciabarra 2004, p. 3
  161. Template:Cite episode
  162. Gladstein 1999, p. 128
  163. Wozniak, Maurice D., ed. (2001). Krause-Minkus Standard Catalog of U.S. Stamps (5th ed.). Krause Publications. p. 380. ISBN 0-87349-321-4. OCLC 48663542.
  164. Burns 2009, p. 258; Rand 2005, p. 73
  165. Powell, Jim (May 1996). "Rose Wilder Lane, Isabel Paterson, and Ayn Rand: Three Women Who Inspired the Modern Libertarian Movement". The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty 46 (5): 322. Archived from the original on May 11, 2011. http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/rose-wilder-lane-isabel-paterson-and-ayn-rand-three-women-who-inspired-the-modern-libertarian-movement/. Retrieved April 15, 2011.
  166. Branden 1986, p. 414
  167. Burns 2009, p. 4
  168. Burns 2004
  169. Doherty 2009, pp. 54
  170. 170.0 170.1 Benfer, Amy (July/August 2009). "And the Rand Played On". Mother Jones. Archived from the original on May 03 2011. http://motherjones.com/media/2009/07/and-rand-played. Retrieved April 15, 2011.
  171. Burns 2009, p. 279
  172. Gladstein 2009, p. 124; Heller 2009, p. xi; Doherty 2009, p. 51; Burns 2009, p. 283
  173. Burns 2009, pp. 283–284; Doherty 2009, pp. 51–52; Gladstein 2009, p. 125
  174. Gladstein 2009, p. 125; Doherty 2009, pp. 54
  175. Doherty 2009, pp. 51–52
  176. Burns 2009, p. 283
  177. Robin, Corey (June 7, 2010). "Garbage and Gravitas". The Nation. Archived from the original on May 14, 2011. http://www.thenation.com/article/garbage-and-gravitas. Retrieved April 15, 2011.
  178. O'Neill 1977, p. 3
  179. 179.0 179.1 Gladstein 1999, p. 115
  180. Nozick, Robert (Spring 1971). "On the Randian Argument". The Personalist 52: 282–304.
  181. Gladstein 2003, pp. 373–374, 379–381
  182. Gladstein 2009, pp. 114–122; Salmieri & Gotthelf 2005, p. 1995; McLemee, Scott (September 1999). "The Heirs Of Ayn Rand: Has Objectivism Gone Subjective?". Lingua Franca 9 (6): 45–55. Archived from the original on May 15, 2011. http://linguafranca.mirror.theinfo.org/9909/rand.html. Retrieved April 15, 2011.
  183. Burns 2009, pp. 295–296
  184. Gladstein 2009, p. 116
  185. Gladstein 2009, p. 118
  186. Gotthelf 2000, pp. 2, 25; Thomas, William (April 2000). "Ayn Rand Through Two Lenses". Navigator 3 (4): 15–19. http://www.atlassociety.org/on-ayn-rand-gotthelf.
  187. Harvey, Benjamin (May 15, 2005). "Ayn Rand at 100: An 'ism' struts its stuff". Rutland Herald. Columbia News Service. http://www.rutlandherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050515/NEWS/505150346/1014. Retrieved June 4, 2009.
  188. Gladstein 2003, p. 375
  189. Gladstein 2003, pp. 384–391
  190. Sciabarra 1995, pp. 9–14
  191. Den Uyl & Rasmussen 1978, p. 203
  192. Wheeler, Jack. "Rand and Aristotle". In Den Uyl & Rasmussen 1986, p. 96
  193. Lewis, John David (October 20, 2001). "Ayn Rand". The Literary Encyclopedia. http://www.litencyc.com/php/speople.php?rec=true&UID=3705. Retrieved August 2, 2009.
  194. Sharlet, Jeff (April 9, 1999). "Ayn Rand Has Finally Caught the Attention of Scholars". The Chronicle of Higher Education 45 (31): A17–A18. http://chronicle.com/article/Ayn-Rand-Has-Finally-Caught/20237/. Retrieved April 15, 2011.
  195. 195.0 195.1 Huemer, Michael (January 22, 2010). "Why Ayn Rand? Some Alternate Answers". Cato Unbound. http://www.cato-unbound.org/2010/01/22/michael-huemer/why-ayn-rand-some-alternate-answers/. Retrieved August 18, 2012.
  196. Humer, Michael (Spring 2002). "Is Benevolent Egoism Coherent?". The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (2): 259–288. http://aynrandstudies.com/jars/archives/jars3-2/jars3_2mhuemer.pdf.
  197. Bass, Robert H. (Spring 2006). "Egoism versus Right". The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7 (2): 329–349. http://aynrandstudies.com/jars/archives/jars7-2/jars7_2rbass1.pdf.
  198. Burns 2009, pp. 280–281; Gladstein 2009, pp. 19, 114
  199. Gladstein 2009, p. 117
  200. Gladstein 2009, pp. 116–117; Burns 2009, p. 297

Works citedEdit

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend

External linksEdit

About
Books
Audio / video
Etc.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).
Template:Template other

}}Template:Ayn Rand Template:Social and political philosophy Template:Criticism of religion

Template:Use mdy dates

Template:Link FA

Template:Link FA Template:Link GA Template:Link GA

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.